WRF-Fire merge testing: Difference between revisions

From openwfm
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:WRF-Fire merge]]
[[Category:WRF-Fire merge]]
'''Please
* Base all future testing on {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model-jm}}, add your own commits as necessary
* base all future testing on {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model-jm}}, add your own commits as necessary
* Record also unsuccessful tests, replace by final result when fixed
* record also unsuccessful tests, replace by final result when fixed
* All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
* all tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
* For real runs, link to the datasets
* for real runs, link to the datasets'''
==Jan on Kingspeak in January-February 2019==
==Jan on Kingspeak in January-February 2019==
All in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).
All in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).

Revision as of 20:19, 3 February 2019

  • Base all future testing on branch fuel-moisture-model-jm, add your own commits as necessary
  • Record also unsuccessful tests, replace by final result when fixed
  • All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
  • For real runs, link to the datasets

Jan on Kingspeak in January-February 2019

All in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).

Using fmc_g vs. baseline

Fuel moisture model

See also