WRF-Fire merge testing: Difference between revisions

From openwfm
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:WRF-Fire merge]]
[[Category:WRF-Fire merge]]
* Base all future testing on {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model-jm}}, add your own commits as necessary
* Base all future testing on {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model-jm}}, add your own commits as necessary
* Record also unsuccessful tests, replace by final result when fixed
* Record also unsuccessful tests, when fixed, replace by the final result and include link to the commit used
* All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
* All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
* For real runs, link to the datasets
* For real runs, link to the datasets

Revision as of 20:24, 3 February 2019

  • Base all future testing on branch fuel-moisture-model-jm, add your own commits as necessary
  • Record also unsuccessful tests, when fixed, replace by the final result and include link to the commit used
  • All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
  • For real runs, link to the datasets

Jan

All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).

Using fmc_g vs. baseline

Fuel moisture model

Angel

See also