Difference between revisions of "WRF-Fire merge testing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Jan== | ==Jan== | ||
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different). | All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different). | ||
| − | |||
===Using fmc_g off vs. WRF4 baseline=== | ===Using fmc_g off vs. WRF4 baseline=== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
==Angel== | ==Angel== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Adam== | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 20:45, 3 February 2019
- Base all future testing on branch fuel-moisture-model-jm, add your own commits as necessary
- Record also unsuccessful tests, when fixed, replace by the final result and include link to the commit used
- All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
- For real runs, link to the datasets
Jan
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).
Using fmc_g off vs. WRF4 baseline
- jm1: ifort serial (13), nesting 0, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-fuel-moisture-model/test/em_fire/ branch fuel-moisture-model c1cedfc7eba28a2ed MERGED CODE COMPILES AS SERIAL namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_simple: SUCCESS COMPLETE WRF
- jm2: ifort serial (13), nesting 0, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-develop/test/em_fire/ branch develop 0f296f9c0f674f9 BUG FIX, remove PX updates namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_simple:
Fuel moisture model off vs. WRF4 baseline
Fuel moisture model vs. wrf-fire
Angel
Adam
See also
- How to build WRF4
- WRF testing requirements
- Information for WRF contributors (outdated but still relevant)
- Comments in e26f21fb33 Fri Mar 9 11:07:01 2018 Cumulative fire commit for v4.0