Difference between revisions of "WRF-Fire merge testing"

From openwfm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
 
* All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
 
* For real runs, link to the datasets
 
* For real runs, link to the datasets
==Jan on Kingspeak in January-February 2019==
+
==Jan January-February 2019==
All in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).
+
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).
  
 
===Using fmc_g vs. baseline===
 
===Using fmc_g vs. baseline===

Revision as of 20:20, 3 February 2019

  • Base all future testing on branch fuel-moisture-model-jm, add your own commits as necessary
  • Record also unsuccessful tests, replace by final result when fixed
  • All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
  • For real runs, link to the datasets

Jan January-February 2019

All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).

Using fmc_g vs. baseline

Fuel moisture model

See also