Porting WRF-SFIRE fuel moisture model to WRF4: Difference between revisions

From openwfm
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* Cherry pick {{wrf-fire-commit|f8193dad36|2011-09-25  adding moisture variables}} and {{wrf-fire-commit|5a6c4b8c06|2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g}}. Making minimal changes against original. Needed to check any changes not only resolve conflicts.
* Cherry pick {{wrf-fire-commit|f8193dad36|2011-09-25  adding moisture variables}} and {{wrf-fire-commit|5a6c4b8c06|2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g}}. Making minimal changes against original. Needed to check any changes not only resolve conflicts.
* Created {{wrf-fire-merge-tag|fuel-moisture-model-added-fmc_g}} at {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|132444f0db6754417|.}} The result should  
* Created {{wrf-fire-merge-tag|fuel-moisture-model-added-fmc_g}} at {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|132444f0db6754417|.}} The result should  
** give the same numbers when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt> in namelist.input or not set
** give the same numbers as code build by checking out {{wrf-fire-merge-tag|wrf-develop-baseline}} when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt> in namelist.input or not set
** take <tt>fmc_g</tt> from <tt>wrfinput</tt> when <tt>fire_fmc_read=0</tt>
** take <tt>fmc_g</tt> from <tt>wrfinput</tt> when <tt>fire_fmc_read=0</tt>
** next: read from file when <tt>fire_fmc_read=2</tt>
** next: read from file when <tt>fire_fmc_read=2</tt>
Should I swap 0 and 1?
Should I swap 0 and 1?


To compile on kingspeak, please see [[https://www.openwfm.org/wiki/How_to_build_WRF4#University_of_Utah_CHPC]]


==The original plan==
==The original plan==

Revision as of 09:58, 21 January 2019

Progress

Should I swap 0 and 1?

To compile on kingspeak, please see [[1]]

The original plan

Too much complexity. There were quite a few conflicts already in cherry pick to 3cdb542af7ce submitted to 3.3 where not much changed. After a day or so, I decided I may as well do it right.