Difference between revisions of "Porting WRF-SFIRE fuel moisture model to WRF4"

From openwfm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:WRF-Fire-merge]]
+
[[Category:WRF-Fire merge]]
 
==Progress==
 
==Progress==
 +
* Started {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model}} from {{wrf-branch|develop}}.
 +
* Cherry pick {{wrf-fire-commit|f8193dad36|2011-09-25  adding moisture variables}} and
 +
{{wrf-fire-commit|5a6c4b8c06|2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g}}.
 +
Some fixing, making minimal changes against original.
 +
* Added {{wrf-sfire-merge-tag|fuel-moisture-model-added-fmc_g}} at
 +
{{wrf-fire-merge-commit|132444f0db6754417|.}} The result should
 +
** give the same numbers when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt> in namelist.input or not set
 +
** take <tt>fmc_g</tt> from <tt>wrfinput</tt> when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt>
 +
** next: read from file when <tt>fire_fmc_read=2</tt>
 +
Should I swap 0 and 1?
 +
  
 
==The original plan==
 
==The original plan==

Revision as of 08:42, 21 January 2019

Progress

5a6c4b8c06 2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g. Some fixing, making minimal changes against original.

132444f0db6754417 . The result should

    • give the same numbers when fire_fmc_read=1 in namelist.input or not set
    • take fmc_g from wrfinput when fire_fmc_read=1
    • next: read from file when fire_fmc_read=2

Should I swap 0 and 1?


The original plan

Too much complexity. There were quite a few conflicts already in cherry pick to 3cdb542af7ce submitted to 3.3 where not much changed. After a day or so, I decided I may as well do it right.