Difference between revisions of "Porting WRF-SFIRE fuel moisture model to WRF4"

From openwfm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
* Started {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model}} from {{wrf-branch|develop}}.
 
* Started {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model}} from {{wrf-branch|develop}}.
 
* Cherry pick {{wrf-fire-commit|f8193dad36|2011-09-25  adding moisture variables}} and
 
* Cherry pick {{wrf-fire-commit|f8193dad36|2011-09-25  adding moisture variables}} and
{{wrf-fire-commit|5a6c4b8c06|2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g}}.  
+
{{wrf-fire-commit|5a6c4b8c06|2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g}}. Making minimal changes against original. Needed to check any changes not only resolve conflicts.
Some fixing, making minimal changes against original.
+
* Created {{wrf-fire-merge-tag|fuel-moisture-model-added-fmc_g}} at {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|132444f0db6754417|.}} The result should  
* Added {{wrf-sfire-merge-tag|fuel-moisture-model-added-fmc_g}} at  
 
{{wrf-fire-merge-commit|132444f0db6754417|.}} The result should  
 
 
** give the same numbers when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt> in namelist.input or not set
 
** give the same numbers when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt> in namelist.input or not set
 
** take <tt>fmc_g</tt> from <tt>wrfinput</tt> when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt>
 
** take <tt>fmc_g</tt> from <tt>wrfinput</tt> when <tt>fire_fmc_read=1</tt>

Revision as of 08:44, 21 January 2019

Progress

5a6c4b8c06 2011-09-26 21:55:09 using variable fuel moisture in fmc_g. Making minimal changes against original. Needed to check any changes not only resolve conflicts.

Should I swap 0 and 1?


The original plan

Too much complexity. There were quite a few conflicts already in cherry pick to 3cdb542af7ce submitted to 3.3 where not much changed. After a day or so, I decided I may as well do it right.