Difference between revisions of "WRF-Fire merge testing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Angel) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:WRF-Fire merge]] | [[Category:WRF-Fire merge]] | ||
| − | * Base all future testing on {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model-jm}}, | + | ==How to test== |
| + | * Base all future testing on {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model-jm}}. When something is changed/fixed, need to retest. | ||
* Record also unsuccessful tests, when fixed, replace by the final result and include link to the commit used | * Record also unsuccessful tests, when fixed, replace by the final result and include link to the commit used | ||
* All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs | * All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs | ||
| − | * For real runs, link to the datasets | + | * For real runs, please link to the datasets to be reproducible |
| − | ==Jan== | + | ==What needs to be tested== |
| + | * Fuel moisture model off vs. WRF4 baseline, with and without fire, that we did not change anything | ||
| + | * Fuel moisture model on, fire on, is it doing what it should? | ||
| + | * WTF as specified in [http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/testing.html WRF testing requirements] | ||
| + | * Ideal cases and maybe some real | ||
| + | ==Jan's test results== | ||
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different). | All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different). | ||
| Line 19: | Line 25: | ||
* jm5: ifort serial (13), nesting 1, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-fuel-moisture-model/test/em_fire/rain {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model}} {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|21e4b028d80723ca|}}: SUCCESS COMPLETE WRF | * jm5: ifort serial (13), nesting 1, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-fuel-moisture-model/test/em_fire/rain {{wrf-fire-merge-branch|fuel-moisture-model}} {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|21e4b028d80723ca|}}: SUCCESS COMPLETE WRF | ||
| − | ==Angel== | + | ==Angel's test results== |
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/kochanski-group3/farguella and run on node kingspeak11 and kinspeak12. All the compilation are done using ifort serial (13), nesting 0. | All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/kochanski-group3/farguella and run on node kingspeak11 and kinspeak12. All the compilation are done using ifort serial (13), nesting 0. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 64: | ||
* Slope FMC_G field: RF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/fmc_slope. | * Slope FMC_G field: RF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/fmc_slope. | ||
| − | ==Adam== | + | ==Adam's test results== |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[How to build WRF4]] | * [[How to build WRF4]] | ||
| + | * [[Fuel_moisture_model#Configuration Fuel moisture model Configuration]] | ||
* [http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/testing.html WRF testing requirements] | * [http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/testing.html WRF testing requirements] | ||
* [http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/contrib_info.php Information for WRF contributors (outdated but still relevant)] | * [http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/contrib_info.php Information for WRF contributors (outdated but still relevant)] | ||
* Comments in {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|e26f21fb33|Fri Mar 9 11:07:01 2018}} Cumulative fire commit for v4.0 | * Comments in {{wrf-fire-merge-commit|e26f21fb33|Fri Mar 9 11:07:01 2018}} Cumulative fire commit for v4.0 | ||
Revision as of 06:46, 5 February 2019
How to test
- Base all future testing on branch fuel-moisture-model-jm. When something is changed/fixed, need to retest.
- Record also unsuccessful tests, when fixed, replace by the final result and include link to the commit used
- All tests should be reproducible by checking out the commit noted, which should include all data for ideal runs
- For real runs, please link to the datasets to be reproducible
What needs to be tested
- Fuel moisture model off vs. WRF4 baseline, with and without fire, that we did not change anything
- Fuel moisture model on, fire on, is it doing what it should?
- WTF as specified in WRF testing requirements
- Ideal cases and maybe some real
Jan's test results
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/u6015690/merge and run on node kingspeak11 (nodes can be different).
Using fmc_g off vs. WRF4 baseline
- jm1: ifort serial (13), nesting 0, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-fuel-moisture-model/test/em_fire/ branch fuel-moisture-model c1cedfc7eba28a2ed MERGED CODE COMPILES AS SERIAL namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_simple: SUCCESS COMPLETE WRF
- jm2: ifort serial (13), nesting 0, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-develop/test/em_fire/ branch develop 0f296f9c0f674f9 BUG FIX, remove PX updates namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_simple:
Fuel moisture model off vs. WRF4 baseline
- ifort serial (13), nesting 1, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-fuel-moisture-model-jm branch fuel-moisture-model-jm 23437602c5633051 23437602c5633051 Merge branch 'fuel-moisture-model-rain' into fuel-moisture-model-jm
- jm3 test/em_fire_simple files at default: namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_simple input_sounding -> input_sounding_hill_simple [now still running]
- jm4 test/em_fire_simple files at default: namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_simple input_sounding -> input_sounding_hill_simple namelist.fire -> namelist.fire_fmc namelist.input -> namelist.input_hill_fuel_moisture [now still running]
Fuel moisture model on
- jm5: ifort serial (13), nesting 1, configure -d, WRF-Fire-merge-fuel-moisture-model/test/em_fire/rain branch fuel-moisture-model 21e4b028d80723ca : SUCCESS COMPLETE WRF
Angel's test results
All kingspeak runs are in /uufs/chpc.utah.edu/common/home/kochanski-group3/farguella and run on node kingspeak11 and kinspeak12. All the compilation are done using ifort serial (13), nesting 0.
Branch develop vs. added-fmc_g
The branch develop and branch added-fmc_g are in kingspeak in folders WRF-Fire-merge-develop and WRF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g respectively. They are tested in order to see the first new functionalities of adding variable FMC_G in WRF4 baseline. Tests are from list in https://www.openwfm.org/index.php?title=Porting_WRF-SFIRE_fuel_moisture_model_to_WRF4#Testing_to_be_done.
fire_fmc_read not present in namelist.input
One can observe that both simple hill simulations are exactly the same running
diff WRF-Fire-merge-develop/test/em_fire/wrf.log WRF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/original/wrf.log -I Timing
which returns
10c10 < alloc_space_field: domain 1 , 344571608 bytes allocated --- > alloc_space_field: domain 1 , 345388824 bytes allocated
Therefore, the only difference is in the allocation size as expected.
However, the new branch added-fmc_g is creating new variable FMC_G taken constant value of fuelmc_g from namelist.fire all over the domain. Changing value of fuelmc_g in namelist.fire changes the value of the new variable FMC_G.
fire_fmc_read present in namelist.input
Setting
fire_fmc_read=0
and poblating FMC_G variable in wrfinput_d01 using ncreplace in Matlab. The branch added-fmc_g uses the new FMC_G in the simulation from new wrfinputs. Tested using:
- Constant FMC_G field of 0.07: WRF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/fmc_07.
- Constant FMC_G field of 0.08: WRF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/fmc_08. Exactly the same results that branch develop which was taking the information from namelist.fire file.
- Random FMC_G field: WRF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/fmc_rand. Gives the progression with random bumps as expected.
- Slope FMC_G field: RF-Fire-merge-added-fmc_g/test/em_fire/hill_tests/fmc_slope.